Truth in argument is about finding the best solution to a problem (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 12). It is not about seeking the right answer (Ramage, Bean and Johnson, 12), As Socrates believed (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 11), nor is it a completely valueless relativism where every answer is equally as good (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 12), as the Sophists in Ancient Greece believed (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 11). It is about achieving a balance.
In fact, the central definition of truth, as defined by Ramage in Writing Arguments, is to select the best or most just solution, keeping an open mind and ultimately taking responsibility for your argument (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 12). Being able to argue in this way allows one to solve arguments rationally, instead of through force (Ramage, Bean, and Johnson, 12).
It is very hard to argue in this way, given the current world view. The world is very competitive, and many people carry agendas. The notion of truth, that is, in this case, the best solution after examing all outcomes, is thus often subverted by the notion of persuasion, which is the solution that a particular party wants implemented because it benefits them.
Works cited:
Ramage, John, John Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments : A rhetoric with Readingsit'. 4th. Pearson Education, Inc, 2007. 11-12. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment